Abstract
This article addresses the profound and multifaceted understanding of interfaces in the modern technological era, focusing on integrating ontological, ethical, and aesthetical approaches in interface research. It considers various aspects of human-machine interaction from philosophical, ethical, and aesthetic viewpoints, revealing the complex connections between technological progress and human experience.
This study provides a comprehensive analysis of contemporary approaches to interface research, covering its complexity and diversity, as well as identifying current trends and challenges in the field.
The findings indicate that successful interface study requires an integrated approach, including the analysis of functional, ethical, aesthetic, and cultural aspects. The article highlights the importance of cross-disciplinary research in developing interfaces that can reflect and develop contemporary cultural and social contexts.
The conclusions of this article are relevant to the researchers in the field of interface design, implementators, and a broad audience interested in understanding the interplay between technological innovations and the socio-cultural context.
References
Bardzell, J. (2011). Interaction criticism: An introduction to the practice. Interacting with Computers, 23(6), 604–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.07.001
Benbunan-Fich, R. (2017). The ethics of online research with unsuspecting users: From A/B testing to C/D experimentation. Research Ethics, 13(3–4), 200–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016116680664
Bertelsen, O. W., & Pold, S. (2004). Criticism as an approach to interface aesthetics. Proceedings of the Third Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/1028014.1028018
Bramall, S. (2000). The Educational Significance of the Interface. Journal of the Philosophy of Education, 34(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.00156
Branch, C. C., Beaton, C. I., McQuaid, M., & Weeden, E. (2021). Perceptions of Ethics in Persuasive User Interfaces. In R. Ali, B. Lugrin, & F. Charles (Eds.), Persuasive Technology (Vol. 12684, pp. 275–288). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79460-6_22
Castillejo, E., Almeida, A., & López-de-Ipiña, D. (2014). Ontology-Based Model for Supporting Dynamic and Adaptive User Interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 30(10), 771–786. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.927287
Chamberlain, D. (2010). Television Interfaces. Journal of Popular Film and Television, 38(2), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/01956051.2010.483354
Cummings, M. L. (2006). Integrating ethics in design through the value-sensitive design approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(4), 701–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-006-0065-0
Diemer, J., Alpers, G. W., Peperkorn, H. M., Shiban, Y., & Mühlberger, A. (2015). The impact of perception and presence on emotional reactions: A review of research in virtual reality. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00026
Emerson, L. (2020). Interfaced. In M. Rubery & L. Price (Eds.), Further Reading (1st ed., pp. 350–362). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198809791.013.29
Farooq, U., & Grudin, J. (2016). Human-computer integration. Interactions, 23(6), 26–32. https://doi.org/10.1145/3001896
Fong, L. C., Waycott, J., Kadir, A., Gispen, J., & Nacke, L. E. (2020). ’Imi Pono: Creating an Ethical Framework for User Experience Design. Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3375161
Galloway, A. R. (2012). The Interface Effect. Polity.
Ikebude, E. (2022). Towards an Alternative Notion of the Interface. Interactive Film & Media Journal, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.32920/ifmj.v2i2.1614
Iqbal, M. W., Ch, N. A., Shahzad, S. K., Naqvi, M. R., Khan, B. A., & Ali, Z. (2021). User Context Ontology for Adaptive Mobile-Phone Interfaces. IEEE Access, 9, 96751–96762. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3095300
Islam, M. N. (2013). Towards Exploring Web Interface Sign Ontology: A User Study. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), HCI International 2013—Posters’ Extended Abstracts (Vol. 373, pp. 41–45). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39473-7_9
Jensen, K. B. (2007). Mixed media: From digital aesthetics towards general communication theory. Northern Lights: Film & Media Studies Yearbook, 5(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1386/nl.5.1.7_1
Latypova, A. R., & Skomorokh, M. M. (2019). Introduction to Interface Ecology. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 4, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.24411/2658-7734-2019-10034 (In Russian).
Lee, M., Sin, J., Laban, G., Kraus, M., Clark, L., Porcheron, M., Cowan, B. R., Følstad, A., Munteanu, C., & Candello, H. (2022). Ethics of Conversational User Interfaces. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3503699
Liu, B., Chen, H., & He, W. (2005). Deriving user interface from ontologies: A model-based approach. 17th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI’05), 6–259. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTAI.2005.55
Luo, S., Wang, Y., & Guo, J. (2009). Research on ontology-based usable user interface layout approach. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Intelligent Systems, 234–238. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICISYS.2009.5357748
Magna, L., & Bardone, E. (2009). Seeking chances through interface design the role of abduction. 2009 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1714–1719. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2009.5346720
Malvik, A. S. (2009). Grensesnittets estetikk: En begrepsanalytisk tilnærming til samtidsestetikken og dens medieparadigme [The aesthetics of the interface: A conceptual analytical approach to contemporary aesthetics and its media paradigm]. Tidskrift För Litteraturvetenskap, 39(3–4), 4–20. https://doi.org/10.54797/tfl.v39i3-4.12070 (In Norwegian)
Muhammad, S. J. N., & Jasni, K. Z. (2018). Malay Epic and Historiography Literature Students’ Perception Towards Interface Design Elements. Asian Social Science, 14(10), 31–37. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v14n10p31
Ocheretyany, K. A. (2021). From Behavioral Design to Reverence for Life: Care Policies for the Digital Environment. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 3(2), 166–193. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v3i2.145 (In Russian).
Ocheretyany, K. A. (2022). Symbiotes of the Digital Environment: to the Epidemiological Theory of the Interface. Discourse, 8(4), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.32603/2412-8562-2022-8-4-29-41 (In Russian).
Paulheim, H. (2011). Ontologies in User Interface Development. In H. Paulheim, Ontology-based Application Integration (pp. 61–75). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1430-8_4
Paulheim, H., & Probst, F. (2010). Ontology-Enhanced User Interfaces: A Survey. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 6(2), 36–59. https://doi.org/10.4018/jswis.2010040103
Reis, A. V. dos, & Gonçalves, B. dos S. (2016). Interfaces Tangíveis: Conceituação e Avaliação [Tangible Interfaces: Conceptualization and Evaluation]. Estudos em Design, 24(2), 92-111. (In Portuguese).
Serada, A. S. (2019). Phantom Affordances in Video Games. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 4, 86–107. https://doi.org/10.24411/2658-7734-2019-10038
Shah, N. (2019). Interface as a mediating technology of organization. In T. Beyes, R. Holt, & C. Pias (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Media, Technology, and Organization Studies (pp. 257–264). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198809913.013.19
Shahzad, S. K. (2011). Ontology-based User Interface Development: User Experience Elements Pattern. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 17(7), 1078–1088. https://doi.org/10.3217/JUCS-017-07-1078
Shahzad, S. K., Granitzer, M., & Helic, D. (2011). Ontological model driven GUI development: User Interface Ontology approach. 2011 6th International Conference on Computer Sciences and Convergence Information Technology (ICCIT), 214–218.
Sommerer, C., Mignonneau, L., & King, D. (Eds.). (2008). Interface Cultures: Artistic Aspects of Interaction (1st ed.). transcript Verlag. https://doi.org/10.14361/9783839408841
Sosnovsky, S., & Dicheva, D. (2010). Ontological technologies for user modelling. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, 5(1), 32–71. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2010.032649
Specker Sullivan, L., & Illes, J. (2016). Beyond ‘communication and control’: Towards ethically complete rationales for brain-computer interface research. Brain-Computer Interfaces, 3(3), 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2016.1213603
Specker Sullivan, L., & Illes, J. (2018). Ethics in published brain–computer interface research. Journal of Neural Engineering, 15(1), 013001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aa8e05
Tripakis, S., Lickly, B., Henzinger, T. A., & Lee, E. A. (2009). On relational interfaces. Proceedings of the Seventh ACM International Conference on Embedded Software, 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1145/1629335.1629346
Van Esler, M. (2021). In Plain Sight: Online TV Interfaces as Branding. Television & New Media, 22(7), 727–742. https://doi.org/10.1177/1527476420917104
Xue, L., Liu, C. J., Lin, Y., & Zhang, W. J. (2015). On redundant human-robot interface: Concept and design principle. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM), 287–292. https://doi.org/10.1109/AIM.2015.7222546
Zhernova, K. N. (2020). Trends and challenges of the human-machine interfaces naturality development. Informatization and communication, 2, 84–95. https://doi.org/10.34219/2078-8320-2020-11-2-84-95
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.