Contested Identities: Exploring the Cultural, Historical and Political Complexities of the ‘Three Chinas’. Translated into Russian by O. S. Yakushenkova
pdf (Русский)

Abstract views: 579
Galleys Downloads: 371

Keywords

National Cinema, Three Chinas, Chineseness, Cultural affinity

How to Cite

Li, Q., & Jennings, R. (2019). Contested Identities: Exploring the Cultural, Historical and Political Complexities of the ‘Three Chinas’. Translated into Russian by O. S. Yakushenkova. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 1(2), 169-200. https://doi.org/10.24411/2658-7734-2019-10018

Abstract

When facing the political, historical and cultural complexities of Mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan, problematic issues arise in relation to understanding the sorts of national/cultural identities that might be projected by them. With regard to these three Chinese language cinemas, a traditional national cinema approach focussing predominantly upon nation-state as a source of meaning would provide only a limited understanding of the meanings generated. This article, however, draws on what Benedict Anderson (1991) put forward as the theory of ‘Imagined Communities’ which assumes a large body of people regard themselves as members of a ‘nation’ (and here we interpret this term broadly and beyond understandings of geographical borders and political systems) through a variety of historical legacies, cultural memories and acts of consumption. In this article we hold the assumption that there is a shared cultural meaning (namely ‘Chineseness’) that extends across the three Chinese language cinemas and consider cultural affinity as greater than national and political boundaries.

https://doi.org/10.24411/2658-7734-2019-10018
pdf (Русский)

References

Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. London: Verso.

Appadurai, A. (1996). Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy. In Global Culture: Nationalism, Globalisation and Modernity, ed. M. Featherstone, London: Sage.

Berry, C. & Farquhar, A. M. (1999). An Analysis of Yellow Earth and Black Canon Incident. In C. E. Linda & D. Desser (ed.), Cinematic Landscapes. Texas: University of Texas Press.

Berry, C. (2011). Transnational Chinese Cinema Studies. In S. H. Lim & J. Ward (Eds.), The Chinese Cinema Book (pp. 9-16). British Film Institute.

Betz, M. (2009). Beyond the Subtitle: Remapping European Art Cinema. University of Minnesota Press.

Chow, R., (1995). Primitive Passions, Visuality, Sexuality, Ethnography, and Contemporary Chinese Cinema. New York: Columbia University Press.

Chu, Y. H. (2004). Taiwan’s National Identity Politics and the Prospect of Cross-strait Relations. Asian Survey, 44(4), 484-512.

Confucius (1996). The Analects. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Editions Limited.

Crofts, S (1998). Concepts of National Cinema. In J. Hill & P. C. Gibson (Eds.), The Oxford Guide to Film Studies (pp. 385-94). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Faulkner, C. (1994). Affective Identities: French National Cinema and the 1930s.Canadian Journal of Film Studies, (3), 2:3-24.

Hall, S. (2004). Cultural Identity and Cinematic Representation. In P. Simpson, A. Utterson & K. J. Shepheroson (Eds.), Critical Concepts in Media and Cultural Studies (pp. 386-97). London: Routledge.

Hayward, S. (1993). French National Cinema. New York, Routledge.

Higbee, W. & Lim, S. H. (2010). Concepts of Transnational Cinema: Towards a Critical Transnationalism in Film Studies’. Transnational Cinemas, 1(1), 7-21.

Higson, A. (2002). The Concept of National Cinema. In C. Fowler (Eds.), European Cinema Reader (pp.132-42). Routledge.

Higson, A. (2006). The Limiting Imagination of National Cinema. In E. Ezra & T. Rowden (Eds.), Transnational Cinema (p.18). Routledge.

Hobsbawm, E. (2012). The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge University Press, Reissue edition.

Lao Tzu (1997). Taoism. Cumberland, Wordsworth Editions Limited.

Liu, F. C. S. & Lee, F. L. F. (2013). Country, National, and Pan-national Identification in Taiwan and Hong Kong: Standing Together as Chinese? Asian Survey, 53(6), 1112-1134.

Lu, S. H. (1997). Transnational Chinese Cinema. University of Hawaii Press.

Madsen, R. (1998). China’s Catholics: Tragedy and Hope in an Emerging Civil Society. California: University of California Press.

Orr J. (1993), Cinema and Modernity, Cambridge: Policy Press.

Park, M. & Chesla, C. (2007). Revisiting Confucianism as a Conceptual Framework for Asian Family Study. Journal of Family Nursing. Retrieved from http://jfn.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/13/3/293

Schubert, G. (2004). Taiwan’s Politics Parties and National Identity. Asian Survey, 53(6), 534-554.

Strother, S. & Strother, B. (2006). Moon Living Abroad in China. Avalon Travel Publishing.

Vincendeau, G. (2001). Film/Literature/Heritage. London, British Film Institute.

Vitali, V. & Willemen, P. (2006). Theorising National Cinema. London, BFI Publishing.

Yau, E. C. M., (2006). "Yellow Earth" Western Analysis and a Non-Western Text. In D. Eleftheriois & G. H. Needham (Eds.), Asian Cinemas: A Reader and Guide. University of Hawaii Press.

Yeh, E. Y. & Davis, D. W. (2008). Re-nationalizing China’s Film Industry: Case Study on the China Film Group and Film Marketization. Journal of Chinese Cinema, 2(1), 37-51.

Yueh, Y. (1998). Defining “Chinese”. Jump Cut, 42:73-6. Retrieved from http://www.ejumpcut.org/archive/onlinpapers/JC42folder/DefiningChinese.html

Zhang, Y. J. (2004). Chinese National Cinema. London and New York: Routledge.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.