Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
An attempt to identify the most influential communities and ideas on social media unavoidably runs into the problem of research space being cluttered with data generated by a plethora of insignificant, artificially inflated and sometimes outright fake communities and personas. To observe the real political activity of netizens, it is necessary to use a set of methods to separate a real online life from its imitation. The object of study is a number of interconnected politicized communities on VK social network. The chronological framework: from 01.03.2024 to 31.05.2024. In order to identify communities and their conglomerates that are the most attractive for netizens, the authors accomplished a set of tasks: mapping politicized communities, determining their political affiliation, revealing mobilized communities and echo chambers. Key research methods are as follows: network mapping, qualitative coding, network analysis. To search for mobilized communities, a new indicator is suggested that is grounded in the theory of self-organized criticality – a theory originating in natural sciences. The largest share of mobilized communities is found in the con-glomerate of patriotic pro-presidential fractions; it is followed by nationalist and liberal fractions. Communities that apparently function as echo chambers are present in all leading conglomerates, but they never occupy a monopolistic central position. The politicized network space is filled with a large number of mixed groups cultivating eclectic views.
The fragmentation of netizens is not in any way complete. This paper is addressed to political scientists, political publicists and those netizens interested in politics.
References
Açıkalın, Ş. N., & Artun, E. C. (2019). The Concept of Self-Organized Criticality: The Case Study of the Arab Uprising. In Ş. Ş. Erçetin & N. Potas (Eds.), Chaos, Complexity and Leadership 2017 (pp. 73‑85). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89875-9_7
Bak, P. (2013). How Nature Works: A Theory of Self-Organized Criticality. URSS. (In Russian).
Baltar, F., & Brunet, I. (2012). Social Research 2.0: Virtual Snowball Sampling Method Using Facebook**. Internet Research, 22(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1108/10662241211199960
Bennett, W. L. (2012). The Personalization of Politics: Political Identity, Social Media, and Changing Patterns of Participation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716212451428
Bixby, S. (2016, October 1). “The end of Trump”: How Facebook** Deepens Millennials’ Confirmation bias. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/oct/01/millennials-facebook-politics-bias-social-media
Borodkin, L. I. (2019). Challenges of Instability: The Concepts of Synergetics in Studying the Historical Development of Russia. Ural Historical Journal, 2, 127–136. https://doi.org/10.30759/1728-9718-2019-2(63)-127-136 (In Russian).
Brunk, G. G. (2001). Self-Organized Criticality: A New Theory of Political Behaviour and Some of Its Implications. British Journal of Political Science, 31(2), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123401000163
Bykov, I. A., & Martyanov, D. S. (2021). Studying Political Communities in VK.com with Network Analysis. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, 3(1), 64–78. https://doi.org/10.46539/gmd.v3i1.144
Dmitriev, A., & Dmitriev, V. (2021). Identification of Self‐Organized Critical State on Twitter Based on the Retweets’ Time Series Analysis. Complexity, 2021(1), 6612785. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6612785
Fedorchenko, S. N. (2023). State-Civilization in the Digital Ecumene. Journal of Political Research, 7(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.12737/2587-6295-2023-7-1-3-26 (In Russian).
Garrett, R. K. (2009). Echo Chambers Online?: Politically Motivated Selective Exposure among Internet News Users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(2), 265–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01440.x
Howe, A. C., Tindall, D. B., & Stoddart, M. C. J. (2023). Drivers of Tie Formation in the Canadian Climate Change Policy Network: Belief Homophily and Social Structural Processes. Social Networks, 75, 107–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2021.06.004
Lu, P., Yang, H., Li, M., & Zhang, Z. (2021). The Sandpile Model and Empire Dynamics. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 143, 110615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110615
Malinetsky, G. G. (2013). The Miracle of Self-Organized Criticality: Introductory Article. In P. Bak, How Nature Works: A Theory of Self-Organized Criticality (pp. 13–46). URSS. (In Russian).
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
Newman, M. E. J. (2002). Assortative Mixing in Networks. Physical Review Letters, 89(20), 208701. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.208701
Newman, M. E. J. (2003). Mixing Patterns in Networks. Physical Review E, 67(2), 026126. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.67.026126
Picoli, S., Castillo-Mussot, M. D., Ribeiro, H. V., Lenzi, E. K., & Mendes, R. S. (2014). Universal Bursty Behaviour in Human Violent Conflicts. Scientific Reports, 4(1), 4773. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep04773
Podlazov, A. V. (2001). New Mathematical Models, Methods and Characteristics in the Theory of Self-Organized Criticality [PhD Dissertation]. Order of Lenin Institute of Applied Mathematics named after M.V. Keldysh, RAS. (In Russian).
Roberts, D. C., & Turcotte, D. L. (1998). Fractality and Self-Organized Criticality of Wars. Fractals, 6(4), 351–357. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218348X98000407
Rossetti, G., Citraro, S., & Milli, L. (2021). Conformity: A Path-Aware Homophily Measure for Node-Attributed Networks. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 36(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2021.3051291
Shimada, I., & Koyama, T. (2015). A Theory for Complex Systems Social Change: An Application of a General “Criticality” Model. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 13(3), 342–353. https://doi.org/10.7906/indecs.13.3.1
Smorgunov, L. V. (2021). Digitalization and Network Effectiveness of Public Governability. Political Science (RU), 3, 13–36. https://doi.org/10.31249/poln/2021.03.01 (In Russian).
Tadić, B., & Melnik, R. (2021). Self-Organised Critical Dynamics as a Key to Fundamental Features of Complexity in Physical, Biological, and Social Networks. Dynamics, 1(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.3390/dynamics1020011
Tadić, B., Dankulov, M. M., & Melnik, R. (2017). Mechanisms of Self-Organized Criticality in Social Processes of Knowledge Creation. Physical Review E, 96(3), 032307. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.96.032307
Tadić, B., Mitrović Dankulov, M., & Melnik, R. (2023). Evolving Cycles and Self-Organised Criticality In social Dynamics. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 171, 113459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2023.113459
Turcotte, D. L., & Rundle, J. B. (2002). Self-Organized Complexity in the Physical, Biological, and Social Sciences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(1), 2463–2465. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.012579399
Volodenkov, S. V., Fedorchenko, S. N., & Pechenkin, N. M. (2023). Opportunities and Features of the Worldview Formation in the Digital Communication Environment: Based on the Materials of an Expert Study. Political Expertise: POLITEX, 19(1), 58–79. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu23.2023.105 (In Russian).
Zhukov, D. (2022). How the Theory of Self-Organized Criticality Explains Punctuated Equilibrium in social Systems. Methodological Innovations, 15(2), 163–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991221100427
Zhukov, D. S., & Lovtsov, V. A. (2024, September 18). DB Politicized communities in VK as of 31.05.2024. Site of the Center for Fractal Modeling of Social and Political Processes. http://ineternum.ru/polit-net-2024/ (In Russian).
Zhukov, D. S., & Lyamin, S. K. (2017). Revolution in the Internet: Self-Organized Criticality Theory to Study Protest Movements. Historical informatics, 4, 11–43. https://doi.org/10.7256/2585-7797.2017.4.24559 (In Russian).
** – belongs to an organization recognized as extremist in the Russian Federation
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.