Abstract
The paper raises the question of the essence and necessity of primary and secondary suffering in psychiatry, oncology, Buddhism, and transhumanism. It directly explores the phenomenon of suffering, drawing a distinction between primary and secondary suffering in these domains of medicine and philosophy. The article presents objections to common misconceptions regarding the irreplaceable and significant role of suffering in human experience and for humanity as a whole.
The study aims to deconstruct the assumed value of primary and secondary suffering for both humans and posthumanity. An analysis of the problem of primary and secondary suffering is conducted to substantiate the fundamental importance of overcoming suffering as such.
One of the research methods employed is the conducting of analytical, focused individual interviews with medical professionals and religious figures, complemented by content analysis. A deconstructive and phenomenological approach is also utilized.
Both psychiatric and oncological fields are selected as exemplars representing the quintessence of mental and physical suffering. Buddhism and transhumanism are chosen as philosophical responses to the suffering addressed in psychiatry and oncology.
Emphasizing the problem of suffering is essential to prioritize its resolution. Meditation is suggested as a method for addressing secondary suffering; science and technology are proposed as means to overcome suffering in general. The article is intended for a broad readership, particularly researchers in philosophy, psychology, futurology, as well as for posthumanists, transhumanists, immortalists, and those interested in the topic of overcoming suffering, illness, senility, and death.
References
Barbur, I. (2001). Etika v vek tekhnologii. Bibleysko-bogoslovskiy institut sv. apostola Andreya. (In Russian).
Barkhatova, A. N. (2014). Problemy opredeleniya ponyatiya «defekt-simptomy» pri shizofrenii. Psikhiatriya, 2, 72–83. (In Russian).
Bostrom, N. (2003). The Transhumanist FAQ: A general Introduction: Vol. 2.1. Nick Bostrom’s Home Page. https://www.nickbostrom.com/views/transhumanist.pdf
Bostrom, N., & Cirkovic, M. M. (2008). Global Catastrophic Risks. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198570509.001.0001
Braidotti, R. (2021). Postchelovek. Izdatel'stvo Instituta Gaydara. (In Russian).
Burkh, V. (2010). Zdorovaya zhizn' v bolezni i boli. Osoznannyy put' osvobozhdeniya ot stradaniya. Ves'. (In Russian).
Burmistrov, S. L. (2019). The Category of Suffering in Buddhism and Brahmanist Philosophy. Pis'mennye Pamiatniki Vostoka, 16(3), 70–84. (In Russian).
Cobb, J. B. (1980). Process Theology and Environmental Issues. Journal of Religion, 60, 440–458. https://doi.org/10.1086/486819
De Camp, L. S., Crook de Camp, C., & Whittington Griffin, J. (1983). Dark Valley Destiny: The Life of Robert E. Howard. Bluejay Books.
Dennett, D. (1988). Conditions of Personhood (M. F. Goodman, Ed.). Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3950-5_7
Frankl, V. (1990). Chelovek v poiskakh smysla. Progress. (In Russian).
Goerzel, B., & Bugaj, S. V. (2006). The Path to Posthumanity: 21st Century Technology and Its Radical Implications for Mind, Society and Reality. Academica Press.
Goncharov, D. I., & Averchenkov, A. V. (2019). Filosofiya tekhnologii i ee osnovnye napravleniya. Upravlenie sotsial'no-ekonomicheskim razvitiem regionov: problemy i puti ikh resheniya, 1, 164–167. (In Russian).
Heidegger, M. (1993). What is Metaphysics? Vladimir Bibikhin. http://www.bibikhin.ru/cto_takoe_metafizika (In Russian).
Hughes, J. (2007). The compatibility of religious and transhumanist views of metaphysics, suffering, virtue and transcendence in an enhanced future. Global Spiral, 860, 2–39.
Hume, D. (1996). Traktat o chelovecheskoy prirode. Mysl'. (In Russian).
Kant, I. (1966). Ideya vseobshchey istorii vo vsemirno-grazhdanskom plane (Vol. 6). Mysl'. (In Russian).
Kharman, G. (2021). Ob"ektno-orientirovannaya ontologiya: Novaya “teoriya vsego”. Ad Marginem Press. (In Russian).
Korol'kova, A. A. (2022). Existential Meaning of Suffering in K. Jasper’s and V. Frankl’s Philosophy. The Scientific Opinion, 37–42. https://doi.org/10.25807/22224378_2022_1-2_37 (In Russian).
Kovalev-Sluchevskiy, K. P. (2020). Georgiy Pobedonosets. Zhizneopisanie i deyaniya (ZhZL). Molodaya gvardiya. (In Russian).
Meyyasu, K. (2017). Posle konechnosti. Esse o neobkhodimosti kontingentnosti. Kabinetnyy uchenyy. (In Russian).
Nidal, L. O. (2015). Kakim vse yavlyaetsya. Eksmo. (In Russian).
Ostrovskiy, A. N. (2020). Kak zakalyalas' stal'. AST. (In Russian).
Pearce, D. (1995). The Hedonistic Imperative. HEDWEB. https://www.hedweb.com/hedab.htm
Popova, O. F. (2013). Avoidance of Suffering as an Existential Setting of Addiction. Acmeology, 2, 82–86. (In Russian).
Rinpoche, Y. M. (2017). Budda, mozg i neyrofiziologiya schast'ya. Orientaliya. (In Russian).
Rostovskiy, D. (1903–1916). Zhitie i stradanie svyatoy velikomuchenitsy Varvary. In Zhitiya svyatykh na russkom yazyke, izlozhennye po rukovodstvu Chet'ikh-Miney svt. Dimitriya Rostovskogo. Moskovskaya Sinodal'naya tipografiya. (In Russian).
Salmina, A.B., & Shnajder, N.A. (2006). Ethic Problems of New Medical Technology. Siberian Medical Review, 3, 106–115. (In Russian).
Senkevich, A. V. (2010). Fenomen stradaniya v sud'be cheloveka. Ivzestia of the Volgograd State Pedagogical University, 3, 8–11. (In Russian).
Strugatskiy, A. N., & Strugatskiy, B. N. (2019). Piknik na obochine. AST. (In Russian).
Taker, Yu. (2018). V pyli etoy planety. Uzhas filosofii. HylePress. (In Russian).
Tokarev, D. A. (2022). Hedonistic attribution of suffering in the philosophical arguments of Georges Bataille. Context and Reflection: Philosophy of the World and Human Being, 11(2A), 68–73. (In Russian).
Tolkien, J. R. R. (2002). The Hobbit, or There and Back Again (N. Rakhmanova, N. Grigor'eva, & V. Grushetskiy, Eds.). Azbuka-klassika. (In Russian).
Trigg, D. (2017). Nechto. Fenomenologiya uzhasa. HylePress. (In Russian).
Vladimirova, N. (2009). Svyataya velikomuchenitsa Ekaterina. Sibirskaya Blagozvonnitsa. (In Russian).
Zakirova, T. V., & Kashin, V. V. (2012). Kontseptsiya virtual'noy real'nosti Zhana Bodriyyara. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 7, 28–36. (In Russian).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.