Spare Time as a New Form of Labor: Digital Professions and Capitalism
pdf (Русский)

Keywords

Theory of media, digital capitalism, digital professions, digital labor, late capitalism, Marxism, social philosophy, philosophy of culture, images of modernity, spare time

How to Cite

Афанасов, Н. (2019). Spare Time as a New Form of Labor: Digital Professions and Capitalism. Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies, (1), 43-61. https://doi.org/10.24411/2658-7734-2019-00002

Abstract

The article offers a critical approach to the current discussion on the increasing of spare time and the reducing of the amount of labor in the digital economy. A common place in the discussion about the development of modern capitalism, characterized mainly by automatisation and robotization of jobs, was the hypothesis of reducing the employment of workers. Based on this assumption, many social theorists have postulated the problem of "spare time", which in the future will be too extent. This will lead to a number of problems, including unemployment and the sense of uselessness of a person. The author calls into question this forecast, referring to the consideration of relevant phenomena for the modern social theory - "digital labor" and "digital professions". The article also offers a new view on the relationship between the post-industrial digital economy and the world of medi. Based on the Marxist analysis of the cultural logic of late capitalism, the article puts forward the thesis that the untapped media world, which culturally mediates capitalism, removes the contradiction between production and consumption. Cultural production is fundamentally not reducable to full automation, since it’s very structure includes consumption. As a result, free time imperceptibly also becomes productive work for a person.

https://doi.org/10.24411/2658-7734-2019-00002
pdf (Русский)

References

Agamben, G. (2008). Coming Community. Moscow: Tri kvadrata.

Agamben, G. (2019). Inactivity of the Economy and the Economy of Inactivity. An Interview. Logos, (1), 133-146.

Allen, R. (2017). The Industrial Revolution: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Anashvili, V., Vakhstayn, V., Medvedev, S. (2019). In Preise of Leisure. Radio Svoboda. Retrieved from https://www.svoboda.org/a/29821384.html

Arora, P. (2019). Re-imagining Digital Leisure Networks Through Global Cities: A Metaphorical Journey. Logos, (1), 85-129.

Bittman, M., Brown, J. and Wajcman, J. (2009). The Mobile Phone, Perpetual Contact and Time Pressure. Work, Employment&Society, (4), 673-691.

Cardon, D., Casilli, A. (2015). Qu’est-ce que le Digital Labor? Bry-surMarne: INA Éditions.

Colin, N., Palier, B. (2015). The Next Safety Net: Social Policy for a Digital Age. Foreign Affairs, (4), 29-33.

Corsani, A. (2015). Transformation of Labor and its Temporalities: Chronological Disorientation and the Colonization of Non-working Time. Logos, (3), 51-71.

Fuchs, C. (2015). Towards Marxian Internet Studies. In Marx in the Age of Digital Capitalism. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 22-67.

Fuchs, C., Mosco, V. (eds.) (2015). Marx in the Age of Digital Capitalism. Leiden-Boston: Brill.

Fuchs, C., Sevignani, S. (2013). What is Digital Labour? What is Digital Work? What’s their Difference? And why do these Questions Matter for Understanding Social Media? tripleC, (2), 237-293.

Gandini, A. (2015). Assessing the Job Quality of “Digital Professions”: A Case of Extreme Work. Studi di Sociologia, (4), 335-352.

Gileva, A. (2011). Medium and his message. Fakel. Retrieved from http://www.fakel.org/page.php?id=37.

Groys, B. (2018). “I See Quentin Meillassoux as Exactly Like Stalin”. An Interview with Boris Groys. Logos, (4), 27-54.

Hofmeester, K., Moll-Murata, C. (2011). The Joy and Pain of Work: Global Attitudes and Valuations, 1500-1650. International Review of Social History, (19), 1-23.

Huws, U. (2014). Labor in the Digital Economy: The Cybertariat Comes of Age. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Jameson, F. (2019). Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Moscow: Gaidar Institute Press.

Koval, T. (1994). Orthodox Labor Ethics. Mir Rossii, (2), 54-96.

Maiatsky, M. (2015). Liberation from Work, Unconditional Income and Foolish Will. Logos, (3), pp. 72-87.

Maiatsky, M. (2015). Otium for Noone? Logos, (3), 46-50.

Mandel, E. (1998). Late Capitalism. London: Verso Books.

McLuhan, M. (2018). Understanding Media. The Extensions of Man. Moscow: Kuchkovo pole.

Pavlov, A.V. (2018). Images of Modernity in the Twenty-First Century: Digimodernism. A Review of Alan Kirby’s Book. Philosophy. Journal of Higher School of Economics, (2), 197-212.

Pavlov, A.V. (2018). Images of Modernity in the Twenty-First Century: Automodernism. Filosofskie nauki, (10), 97-113.

Pogrebnyak, A. (2019). Defetishizing Free Time: From Akrasia to Profanation. Logos, (1), 159-188.

Robert, K. (2010). Understanding New Media: Extending Marshall McLuhan. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

Sedgwick, J., Pokorny, M. (1999). Movie Stars and the Distribution of Finally Successful Films in the Motion Picture Industry. Journal of Cultural Economics, (4), 319-323.

Sidorina, T.Y. (2018). Life without Labor or Labor for Salvation? Saint-Petersburg: Aleteia.

Sidorina, T.Y., Ishchenko, N.I. (2015). Labour Centrism as a Lifestyle: Limits of the Labour’s Possibilities of People. Terra Economicus, (3), 136-146.

Srnicek, N. (2019). Platform Capitalism. Moscow: HSE Publishing House.

Suárez-Vázquez, A. (2011). Critic Power or Star Power? The Influence of Hallmarks of Quality Motion Pictures: An Experimental Approach. Journal of Cultural Economics, (2), 119-135.

Vakhshtayn, V., Maiatsky, M. (2019). Contingent Labor – Forced Leisure. A discussion. Logos, (1), 1-26.

Veblen, T. (1984). The Theory of Leisure Class. Moscow: Progress.

Weber, M. (2002). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Moscow: East-View.

Winseck, D. (2017). The Geopolitical Economy of the Global Internet Infrastructure. Journal of Information Policy, (7), 228-267.

Žižek, S. (2014). The Perverts’ Guide to Cinema: Cinema, Philosophy, Ideology. Ekaterinburg: Gonzo.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.